Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Today I saw and heard, on Fox News, IRS exempt organizations director, Lois Lerner, say, after taking the testamentary oath at a House of Representatives Oversight Committee hearing, that she had not done anything wrong. “I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations,” and then she took the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Lerner was in danger of criminal prosecution even though she was just a high level employee doing a job invented by Congress. She is guilty of not knowing the difference between a powerless employee and an officer of the United States of America. Since 1952, the employee inmates have run the asylum at the Internal Revenue Taxpayer Service. The customers are finally realizing they don’t have to buy what the IRS is selling.
The history of federal taxation from 1789 to 1948 is told in the United States Government Printing Office publication, “The Work and Jurisdiction of the Bureau of Internal Revenue,†which is available by doing an Internet search on that title. That booklet documents the time in American history when federal taxes were collected by Collectors of Internal Revenue, who had been appointed by the President of the United States of America with the advice and consent of the Senate and who were bonded in an amount determined by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. For an era of 163 years real federal taxes were collected by real federal Collectors of Internal Revenue although the collections were made outside the district where the taxes were owed.
The conservative targeting scandal is a direct result of the abolition of the Collectors of Internal Revenue by IRS Reorganization Plan No.1 of 1952, which took federal tax collection away from sixty-five Collectors of Internal Revenue and handed it to thousands of employees without any government power to collect federal taxes. IRS employees could and did accept payments voluntarily made into the Treasury of the United States. When payments were not volunteered, IRS employees pretended to be Collectors of Internal Revenue.
The employee run Internal Revenue Service evolved from the United States Treasury Department’s government Bureau of Internal Revenue, while Treasury pretended nothing had changed. Thus, was born the longstanding practice, embraced by both Republican and Democratic administrations not to delve into the details of the IRS’s administration and enforcement of federal tax laws.
Mitt Romney vowed to repeal Obamacare when he was elected President, so IRS employees did everything in their power to re-elect Barack Hussein Obama by making difficulties for Obama’s political opponents.
Learning difficult tax law is easier when there are big rewards. Congress wants to know what happened at the IRS. You can teach anyone the law once you learn it. Contact me at [email protected] the details.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
'Internal Revenue Service Scandal – The Abolition of the Collectors of Internal Revenue in 1952' have 8 comments
May 24, 2013 @ 4:49 pm Paul Andrew Mitchell
At Footnote 23 in Chrysler Corp. v. Brown,
the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that they could find
no organic (“organizing”) Act for the IRS,
even after they searched for one all the way back
to the Civil War.
One can confirm this harsh reality by reading
31 U.S.C. 301 thru 315, the statutes which “organized”
the U.S. Department of the Treasury
(the one domiciled in Washington, D.C.)
The IRS is now what was left over of
“The Untouchables” after alcohol Prohibition
was repealed by the Twenty-First Amendment.
Henry Ford had been advocating ethanol for fuel,
but corrupt world bankers had other ideas!
The Women’s Christian Temperance Union
was secretly financed by the petroleum cartel —
to perfect a monopoly in automotive fuels.
Once that monopoly was in place,
Prohibition was repealed, leaving alcohol
high and dry as the preferred fuel for
cars and trucks, and leaving a
Federal police force inside the several States —
to continue extorting money from the American People.
“Puerto Rico” is mentioned expressly in the Regulations
for Title 27 — Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms —
in the definitions of “Revenue Agent”, “Secretary” and
“Secretary or his delegate” at 27 CFR 26.11.
IRS is now an alias for the former Federal Alcohol
Administration (“FAA”), which was declared illegal
inside the several States by the decision of the
U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. v. Constantine.
But, a compromise allowed that FAA to retreat
to San Juan, Puerto Rico, under a false and
rebuttable theory that the guarantees of the U.S.
Constitution do not extend into Federal Territories.
However, Congress expressly extended the entire
U.S. Constitution into all Federal Territories
in 1873, even FUTURE Federal Territories.
Hope this helps.
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General (18 U.S.C. 1964)
May 24, 2013 @ 5:13 pm Big M
The Internal Revenue Code does not apply to the IRS, and it does not authorize the IRS to enforce any part of it.
I’ve been reading lately about people and their experiences with trying to get tax-exempt status from the IRS. I’m not sure what kind of taxes are being dealt with, but since the IRS, by its own collection, is a debt collection agency, and thus comes under Title 15 of the US Code — and NOT Title 26, as everybody seems to believe — where in the hell does the IRS get any legal authority to give ANYBODY tax-exempt status? Where did this crap get started?
And I need to address this paragraph:
“The employee run Internal Revenue Service evolved from the United States Treasury Department’s government Bureau of Internal Revenue, while Treasury pretended nothing had changed. Thus, was born the longstanding practice, embraced by both Republican and Democratic administrations not to delve into the details of the IRS’s administration and enforcement of federal tax laws.”
The IRS was never created by any act of CONgress, and it is NOT part of the US Dept. of Treasury in DC, and I don’t believe that it ever has been. The Bureau of Internal Revenue was essentially just a bunch of scattered tax collectors INFORMALLY called the Bureau of Internal Revenue, and when it was renamed Internal Revenue Service in 1953, all that happened was that an informal nickname was changed to something else. There is no statute anywhere that documents the creation of any statutory agency called either Bureau of Internal Revenue or Internal Revenue Service.
May 24, 2013 @ 5:14 pm Big M
A small correction. I meant to say that the IRS, by its own ADMISSION, is a debt collection agency. Sorry about that.
May 24, 2013 @ 7:12 pm Internal Revenue Service Scandal – The Abolition of the Collectors of Internal Revenue in 1948 « Document The Truth
[…] Internal Revenue Service Scandal – The Abolition of the Collectors of Internal Revenue in 1948 Related Posts:LIVE Senate: Internal Revenue Service Targeting of PoliticalIRS Official in Targeting Scandal Now Overseeing Obamacare…Humane Society protected by IRS’ Lois Lerner?Top IRS official pleads the 5th Amendment at testy House…How High Up Does This Go? New Report Implicates Washington… […]
May 24, 2013 @ 7:32 pm John Hawk
The IRS is a Collection Agency for the FRB…my dad taught me that when I was 16…
…and why?
The FRB owns the government by indebting the government to them…
…and how does the government pay the debt?
It doesn’t we do, the ‘taxpayers’…
May 24, 2013 @ 7:58 pm mop up
which few seem to grasp: IRS existance itself is the scandal. this slush fund for a few zionist families in EU- known as the Fed Reserve, headed by the Rothschild cabal is the biggest financial swindle of all time. the IRS is its death squad wing, collecting the dough and taking hostages for its owners. “creature of jekyll island” eustace mullins, anthony sutton… Fed Reserve-IRS mafia =slickest scamm in history
May 25, 2013 @ 4:37 am desertspeaks
18 USC § 6002 – Immunity generally
Whenever a witness refuses, on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or provide other information in a proceeding before or ancillary to—
(1) a court or grand jury of the United States,
(2) an agency of the United States, or
(3) either House of Congress, a joint committee of the two Houses, or a committee or a subcommittee of either House,
and the person presiding over the proceeding communicates to the witness an order issued under this title, the witness may not refuse to comply with the order on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination; but no testimony or other information compelled under the order (or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or other information) may be used against the witness in any criminal case, except a prosecution for perjury, giving a false statement, or otherwise failing to comply with the order.
May 25, 2013 @ 9:14 am ptimpone
From Dr. Rivera
Collectors of Internal Revenue and Deputy Collectors of Internal Revenue were Officers of the United States of America before their Offices were abolished.
Article II Section 2 Clause 2 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 provides for the nominations of Officers of the United States by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate:
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
It is not the President of the United States who has the power of appointment, which is an executive power. Article II Section 1 Clause 1 expressly vests the executive power in “a President of the United States of America,†a different Office.
The President of the United States is charged in Article I Section 7 Clauses 2 &3 with the duty to approve or object to Bills passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate he is, therefore, to administer the property and the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. The Office of President of the United States is expressly made subject to impeachment by the House of Representatives and trial by the Senate the only condition to such impeachment being that the Chief Justice shall preside.
As there is no constitutional impediment to an elected President of the United States of America holding that Office and the Office of President of the United States, every President of the United States of America since George Washington has followed the precedent set by Washington and has held both Offices by taking the oral oath of the Office of President of the United States after his election.
The abolition of the Offices of Collector of Internal Revenue and Deputy Collector of Internal Revenue was part of a plan by various Presidents of the United States of America and Congresses to expand the federal government’s legitimate taxation power beyond the United States, the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, by removing all the tax collecting Officers of the United States and replacing them with employees tasked with tax collection.
The replacement of the Collectors of Internal Revenue and Deputy Collectors of Internal Revenue with employees produced a cadre of super powerful federal bureaucrats capable of gross misconduct arising from their exercise of the master’s taxing power while under the protection of respondeat superior. IRS Director and employee of the Internal Revenue Service, Lois Lerner has demonstrated what a bad idea replacement of the Collectors of Internal Revenue with IRS employees was.
Ed Rivera