Tin Foil Hat Wednesday

Scott Horton

Special 9/11 – Geopolitics Show

 

Scott Horton says all the various “conspiracy theories” on how the twin towers fell, are the true tin foil hat stuff that is coloring the “who done it”, why was it done and so on.  He’s incredibly well read and as far away from “conventional wisdom” on most everything.  Yet, he suggests the buildings fell, including Building 7 solely from the two planes crashing into the towers.  We were surprised and intrigued, as you will be with a listen

Scott Horton is director of the Libertarian Institute, editorial director of Antiwar.com, host of Antiwar Radio on Pacifica, 90.7 FM KPFK in Los Angeles, California and podcasts the Scott Horton Show from this website. He’s the author of the 2017 book, Fool’s Errand: Time to End the War in Afghanistan.

In 2007, Horton won the Austin Chronicle‘s “Best of Austin” award for his Iraq war coverage on Antiwar Radio.

He’s conducted more than 5,000 interviews since 2003.

Scott’s articles have appeared at Antiwar.com, The American Conservative magazine, the History News Network, The Future of FreedomThe National Interest and the Christian Science Monitor. He also contributed a chapter to the 2019 book, The Impact of War.

He is a fan of, but no relation to the lawyer from Harper’s.

Also look for Scott’s newest book, “The Great Ron Paul”, a compilation of 15 years of interviews with Mr. Paul

Scott lives in Austin, Texas with his wife, investigative reporter Larisa Alexandrovna Horton.

Scott’s book, blog StressTwitterYouTubePatreon.

Email scott at scotthorton.org

Get a pure Libertarian view on tariffs

Mr. Horton suggests that the twin towers and building 7 did in fact come down because of the two planes and nothing else.

Hear the reasons why Bill Clinton’s actions precipitated the attack on 911

He lays out a vision of the Internationalist for Full Spectrum Dominance because this is what they want and this is what they can do

Afghanistan remains on the U.S. plate because the big wig military men just won’t admit they failed will always fail there.

 

Scott Horton on the geo political landscape he sees after many thousands of interviews with key players, Septmeber 11, 2019 ONE

Scott Horton on the geo political landscape he sees after many thousands of interviews with key players, Septmeber 11, 2019 TWO



Missing Podcast?

If you see an error with an archived podcast or know that an episode of our show is missing, please press the button below to send us a message so we can look into it.

Enter your name and email if you want to be notified when this podcast is fixed:

'Scott Horton – Gives His Take on 911 and the Geopolitical Landscape After Thousands of Hours of Interviews with Key Players- September 11, 2019' have 15 comments

  1. September 12, 2019 @ 9:09 am Jim Hickox

    Good guest but he is wrong about most of 9/11 stuff. Building 7? Not motive?!? Lol!!!!!!!

    Reply

    • September 12, 2019 @ 12:37 pm patrick

      Not sure about any of this when it comes to what “exactly” happened to the three buildings. From a pure logical big picture perspective it is a stretch for me to “believe” fires brought down building 7 in an obvious demolition job. And I think Scott missed the point brought up about how critical the materials in Building Seven were.

      Andrew Gause talked about this..not sure what show exactly..but there was tons of “dirty” laundry that forces wanted be be gone..tons,

      Reply

      • September 12, 2019 @ 12:40 pm patrick

        Maybe we are all just to caught up in the idea that the official story has to be wrong..because we don’t trust these people. I am not sure, but his big picture explanation of who did it , the motives, the players and the USG role made lots of sense to me. But, what do I know?
        Where Scott lost me, as many of you, is the mechanics of how the three buildings went down. But, maybe that doesn’t matter?

        Reply

      • September 13, 2019 @ 10:56 am Karl

        Wow. He really is deluded, he knows more than all the demolition experts, engineers and architects combined. I lasted 20 min before turning off.

        Reply

  2. September 12, 2019 @ 11:26 am Blobby

    Puzzled as to how someone who clearly knows how corrupt governments are can believe the official story of 9/11.

    Reply

  3. September 12, 2019 @ 12:27 pm patrick

    from Linda
    Hi Patrick,
    Just listened to Scott Horton.. for someone who supposedly investigates things it was extremely disappointing to listen to him slide over and ignore all of the overwhelming evidence surrounding 911.
    Airplanes???? Duh? REALLY???? He’s been drinking the wrong koolaid .
    It felt like he was a mouthpiece for the neocons. Just kept babbling on and on with pretty much ther official lies.

    On a positive note,
    Really liked dr Judy Woods video. I’ve listened to her years ago. She is methodical, logical, and a legitimate truth seeker. There are many “plants” in the truth movement to confuscate the truth and to muddy the waters so no one will find out what really went on during 911.
    Scott was a total disappointment.. I’m sure he blindsided you too.
    Judy was a shining light…
    Can you interview her sometime?
    PS…. loved the Andrew Gause interview. As always he was awesome and we all really miss that great intellect and great spirit.
    Linda

    Reply

    • September 12, 2019 @ 12:43 pm patrick

      Well, I can assure you Scott is not a plant for the neocons. He’s one of the most well researched people on the Planet talking to the players, reporters, investigators etc. in Geo politics for man years. Countless hours of conversations and reading. I think there’s a lot to glean from this man, if one is interested, so don’t throw the baby out with the bath water.

      Reply

      • September 12, 2019 @ 10:23 pm Allen

        Maybe it’s the Hydrogen that’s messing with your head, Pat!?! That dude is a FRAUD! You say he’s one of the most “well researched people on the Planet”, yet he said bldg 7 fell from “fire”. THAT’S IMPOSSIBLE, PAT! And you should know that! THERMATE! EVIDENCE!… https://www.ae911truth.org/wtc7
        Come on, man!! The worst thing you can do is give credence to these types. And we’re not saying he’s a plant for the neocons, Pat. CIA, NSA, FBI, military industrial complex/global corporations/banksters (remember the evidence lost in bldg 7????), YES!

        Reply

        • September 13, 2019 @ 2:00 am patrick

          I have said on other posts in this thread I think Scott is off on his assessment of “how” the buildings came down…but, only off compared to what I “think”. What do I ” know” for sure? Nothing. What does anyone “know” for sure? Nothing.
          These are all opinions….everyone gets to have one.

          His research into the forensics of geo politics, the players and where the bodies are buried is excellent. He’s young fellow and like all of us can get too much this way or that on some ideas we’ve looked at….

          As I said, seeing what I’ve seen, the same films as most of you..can’t see how bldg. 7 came down with fires…that just doesn’t seem possible.

          We have lots of folks on that some of the ideas are contrary to ours…that’s OK. Let’s be open, free speech works around here. Thanks

          Reply

  4. September 12, 2019 @ 12:33 pm patrick

    From: Kevin Mabry
    Email: [email protected]
    City: Nags Head
    State: North Carolina

    Message Body:
    Patrick,
    I listened to about half an hour of your guest on Wednesday, Scott Horton. I listened to his opinions and information about 911 and had to turn it off. There are so many other nuggets of information that make you scratch your head that goes against what he was saying. So many I could not list in this email alone. Not having a live show during Scott’s time on your show, I would have otherwise gladly called in to discuss those things with your guest. Anyhow, a “You tuber” I subscribe to made a short video and put it out there on 911. I will try to leave the link for you to check out. Thanks for all you do. Kevin
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9gQKFizU70

    Reply

  5. September 13, 2019 @ 6:23 am Catol

    Patrick…I sure love you and your show. Yet..I found that I might keep the baby: Scott’s take on geopolitics..but I would definitely throw out the bathwater: his ridiculous unstudied take on the destruction of the buildings.
    First indication of his lack of education was when he said the buildings “fell”. Studying videos clearly show they disintegrated into powder. If they “fell”..the pile of rubble would have been mountainous. George Stephanopoulos, hours after, commented that the buildings were GONE! There was almost no rubble pile in the spot where the towers stood. Dr Judy Wood explains that powerful directed energy machine achieved this. The surrounding basement walls that protected the buildings from the nearby waters..WERE INTACT!!! If towering buildings fell..those retainer walls should have been crushed. The bank building next door had its damaged facade rebuilt but it kept self destructing and had to be torn down and replaced. Why? Because the energy in the walls kept dissolving way after the initial attack. No airplane can penetrate a double steel framed building. The wings are so delicate it clearly says NOT A STEP on airplane wings. Firemen trapped in the building looked up and saw sky! They should have been covered with floors of debris! Cars were upside down in trees blocks away. All vehicles had no windows or door handles and rust immediately appeared and they seemed burned, but papers in cars and all over the ground were untouched. The more one studies the physics of the event..the more awareness rises that an energy weapon, unknown to us was used. WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? By Judy Wood delivers the evidence. Scott has not made himself intimately informed about the physics..It is very apparent.For that..consult a building forensics scientist: Dr Wood.

    Reply

  6. September 13, 2019 @ 5:38 pm JSheehan

    Go to start page or google, type in WTC Towers exploding, Look at 10-12 telling photos and it is clear that the official narrative is total bulls__t. The WTC buildings did not “collapse” as we were told over and over and over again in the news media. Those buildings were ripped apart, crushed and dustified in mid-air by some form of terrifying explosive energy. In some photos, as the Towers begin to come down, you can see tons of dust is shooting upwards, defying gravity. I can totally understand why most Americans accept the official story and move on. The real story is just too dark, too scary.

    Reply

  7. September 13, 2019 @ 7:53 pm patrick

    I’ve not spent time truly looking at this over the years. Yet, I do remember watching one video of people..many…lots of people from all walks of life who very clearly experienced explosions ….45 minutes AFTER the plane hit…after and right before the whole thing collapsed.

    This one video alone blows Scott’s theories on the planes and the planes alone caused the buildings to fall.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1_9W9OIoI4

    Reply

  8. September 14, 2019 @ 4:09 pm glor

    Patrick,
    It is because of thinking, or not thinking, like yours that this world is in the shape it is in.
    Maybe you need to ditch the slogan, “There is nothing more expensive than bad information.” What a joke!

    Reply

    • September 14, 2019 @ 5:42 pm patrick

      With all due respect glor….I don’t think you understand how this all works. You get to decide what is right or wrong. You, not me…so..you want me to start editing and making the decision of who to have on because what Patrick thinks is the truth?

      If so, I suspect you are thrilled with what Google, Facebook, You Tube et al. are doing…deciding for you what “bad information” is.

      Nothing is more expensive than bad information..but, it is your money and your choice on where to spend it. Think freedom….personal responsibility…all else as you say “is a joke.”

      Reply


Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.

©Copyright One Radio Network 2019 • All rights reserved. | Site built by RedLotus AustinThe information on this website and talk shows is solely for informational and entertainment purposes. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE MEDICAL ADVICE. Neither the Editors, producers of One Radio Network, Patrick Timpone, their guests or web masters take responsibility for any possible consequences from any treatment, procedure, exercise, dietary modification, action or application of medication which results from reading or following the information contained on this website in written or audio form, live or podcasts. The publication of this information does not constitute the practice of medicine, and this information does not replace the advice of your physician or other health care provider. Before undertaking any course of treatment, the reader must seek the advice of their physician or other health care provider and take total responsibility for his or her actions at all times. Patrick Joseph of the family of Timpone, a man...All rights reserved, without recourse.