” Climate Change ” / Everyone is on One Side of the Boat
Trader Scott’s Market Blog
January 15, 2017
It has become religion to believe in global warming, excuse me climate change. In fact, apparently now it’s been shortened to just climate, as in “climate denier”. I’m no scientist, but haven’t we always had climate? When did someone suddenly discover we have climate? The religion around “climate” is disconcerting enough, but the strident attitude towards anyone with an opposing view is frightening. There have been calls from “reputable” people to prosecute anyone with a different viewpoint. The “climate” scheme/racket has been built aroundfraud. In 2007, U.N. “scientists” warned we only have eight yearsleft to deal with “global warming” – oops. (Back in 2007, global warming was the trendy term, now it’s climate change.) Also in 2007, U.N. “scientists” warned us that only carbon taxes will save us. Sound familiar. So they’re going to take totally fraudulent science, basically fake news, and cripple the world economy, just so the disgusting globalists can line their own pockets. And harm possibly billions of good, honest people in the process. While not warning of/researching a potential climate disaster awaiting us if the global cooling issue is the real problem.
The “science” promoted by the grotesque (in many ways) hypocrites who attend Davos, is generally being used to enrich themselves and their globalist elitist comrades. They could care less about climate change. But how they have gotten most scientists, universities, MSM, SJWs, and mainstream politicians in all countries to join in is beyond me. The ones who are doing it purely for the money is easy to understand (yet disgusting), but how about the others. Like those who are seeing zero cash flow from their zealotry. And what if theEarth is not actually warming at all? What if it’s actually beginning to cool – significantly? Is a newMaunder minimumstaring right at us? Some villified and ridiculed (and brave and ethical) scientists believe so. Professor Valentina Zharkovahas done some troubling research which goes far beyond the normal 11 year solar cycle. She and her colleagues are quite concerned about another Maunder minimum, which itself was part of the Little Ice Age, fast approaching.
The current solar cycle #24 is the weakest in 100 years, and is still not expected to hit its’ minimum for several years. And we are already in the process of cooling significantly. As Dr. Sircus shows, even the scam artists at NOAA tried to hide the fact that there has been no warming on our Planet for 60 years. And there was actually some cooling into 1979, and then some warming into 2010, with sunspot activity. So as Professor Zharkova stated, we are now back on the downside since around 2012. And there are scientists who have proposed that it is not the CO2 increase which causes the warming, but the warming which causes the CO2 levels to rise.
Russian solar physicistHabibullo Abdussamatovhas some interesting observations about the hysteria over “climate”. He believes the current theories are a.. backwards. Meaning, they’re confusing cause and effect. The cyclic increase in sunspot activity into about 2012 caused the oceans to warm and then to release more CO2. So it wasn’t the increased CO2 causing the warming, but the warming caused the CO2 increase. Professor Abdussamatov believes it’s the sun, not the CO2, which should be the focus. How did we have all of the large warming periods on this planet before the burning of fossil fuels/modern man? The Professor’s studies with ice core samples shows the CO2 increases always follow the Earth’s warming cycles, i.e., never precede the warming. So are all of the regulations, carbon taxes, and beating up of climate “deniers” going to just make a difficult time period even worse? One thing is certain. Most of the “informed” capital is positioned for global warming. On a big time frame, it’s akin to the biggest speculative long position of all time. It makes more sense to contemplate the possibility of a different scenario. In a follow up post, investment opportunities will be discussed.
Trader Scott has been involved with markets for over twenty years. Initially he was an individual floor trader and member of the Midwest Stock Exchange, which then led to a much better opportunity at the Chicago Board Options Exchange. By his early 30’s, he had become very successful in markets, but a health situation caused him to back away from the grind of being a full time floor trader. During this time away from markets, Scott was completely focused on educating himself about true overall health and natural healing which remains a passion to this day.Scott returned to markets over fifteen years ago where he continues as an independent trader.
January 15, 2017 @ 8:14 pm David V
The climate change they don’t want known.
There is an interesting point to mention in passing. Though the ground is frozen for 1,900 feet down from the surface at Prudhoe Bay, everywhere the oil companies drilled around this area they discovered an ancient tropical forest. It was in a frozen state, not in petrified state. It is between 1,100 and 1,700 feet down. There are palm trees, pine trees, and tropical foliage in great profusion. In fact, they found them lapped all over each other, just as though they had fallen in that position.
January 15, 2017 @ 8:31 pm traderscott
David, very interesting articles – how is this research out there, yet the hysteria over “man made” global warming is deafening. There are real environmental problems, like toxic waste sites, and pesticide/fertilizer runoff, etc. But we’re focused on total crap, because the globalists are trying to suck us dry. How were these tropical cinditions possible. I thought man caused all of the warming and CO2s.
January 15, 2017 @ 9:28 pm David V
Seems fair they should also regulate trace gases from the earth:
January 15, 2017 @ 11:04 pm traderscott
Al Gore is probably trying to scheme how he can make a few more billion from the “diffuse” CO2.
January 16, 2017 @ 7:00 pm George
Professor Brits https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Yze1YAz_LYM
left me in an agnostic state.
He talks about added CO2 of 9 gigatons annually, a lot compared to his other estimates.
But how does that compare with ocean release in the past?
Seems like short term solar minimum, clouds, snow (albedo effect) may produce a mini ice age?
Adapt 2030 on youtube shows some record lows around the globe already.
January 16, 2017 @ 8:16 pm traderscott
The Professor is the Jerry Lewis (Nutty Professor) of the geology field, but it’s an informative video. The thing is the big bet (positioning) is being made on global warming – what if it’s wrong? That’s where the real potential is. On a big picture, it’s about considering taking the other side.
January 17, 2017 @ 5:57 pm Fred
Scott you get an A for being able to spell Khabibullo Abdussamatov. The article is also great. Labeling the issue climate change is so obscure. I get it if you tell me that we are putting mercury into our air and that we should not do that, but it makes no sense to me to me to say we have a problem with climate change.
January 17, 2017 @ 6:09 pm traderscott
Hi Fred. You’d laugh if you saw me spell his name out letter by letter, and I’m part Russian to boot. I so agree Fred. We have real, dangerous, toxic environmental issues. The trillions being wasted on something we don’t even know if it’s real or not, while totally ignoring all of the real issues that are here right now – like as you said mercury in China or wherever, maybe even in our country. It’s completely disheartening.
February 26, 2017 @ 8:47 am CO2isLife
If the SEC ever looked into the practices of the climate “scientists” they would all be wearing striped shirts. The only reason climate “science” has gotten as far as it has is because no one has ever actually looked behind the curtain. Once they did, the fraud would be obvious. Simply download the CO2 and temperature data for the past 60 years (when CO2 measurements began) and run a regression. The R-Squared is basically non-existant. The relationship doesn’t exist. The following links go into greater detail.
Climate “Science” on Trial; The Criminal Case Against the Alarmists
How to Discuss Global Warming with a “Climate Alarmist.” Scientific Talking Points to Win the Debate.
Climate “Science” on Trial; Cherry Picking Locations to Manufacture Warming
February 26, 2017 @ 9:00 am traderscott
Thanks. I might start linking you at my new website.
May 1, 2017 @ 6:00 pm " Climate Change " / Everyone is on One Side of the Boat
[…] Originally published on One Radio Network […]