Thursday, July 26, 2012 by: Jonathan Landsman
Now, for the first time ever, Nicholas Gonzalez, M.D. reveals how his enzyme-based approach was deliberately designed to fail compared to conventional (chemotherapy) treatment protocols for cancer. The next NaturalNews Talk Hour will forever change the way you look at “modern” cancer research and western medicine.
Visit: http://www.naturalhealth365.com and enter your email for FREE show details + a FREE gift!
Can enzyme-based therapy help cancer patients?
In 1906, embryologist Dr. John Beard proposed that pancreatic proteolytic digestive enzymes represent the body’s main defense against cancer, and that enzyme therapy would be useful as a treatment for all types of cancer. Particularly during the first two decades of the twentieth century, Dr. Beard’s thesis attracted some attention in academic circles, and several case reports in the medical literature documented tumor regression and even remission in terminal cancer patients treated with proteolytic enzymes.
In 1911, Dr. Beard published a monograph entitled “The Enzyme Therapy of Cancer and Its Scientific Basis”, which summarized his therapy and the supporting evidence. More recently, Nicholas Gonzalez, M.D. authored “The Trophoblast and the Origins of Cancer” – which reviews Dr. Beard’s work from the perspective of contemporary molecular biology. Don’t miss this rare opportunity to learn more about an amazingly successful (natural) way of treating cancer.
The NaturalNews Talk Hour begins this Thursday evening at 6pm Pacific / 9pm Eastern, and registration is FREE. Click this link – http://www.naturalhealth365.com and enter your email for FREE show details + a FREE gift!
The Truth about the NCI-NCCAM Clinical Study
In 1998, the NCI approved funding for a large scale clinical study, in which Dr. Gonzalez’s nutritional-enzyme therapy would be compared to the best available chemotherapy in the treatment of patients diagnosed with inoperable pancreatic cancer. Along with his colleague Dr. Linda Isaacs, they initially approached this project with enthusiasm, believing it to be a wonderful opportunity to bring the conventional academic world and “alternative” researchers, so often at odds, together for the benefit of science and for patients suffering terrible illness. But as the years passed, they realized (with disappointment) that the same biases against treatment methods developed outside of the mainstream still reigned supreme.
In fact, scientists and physicians at the highest levels of academia would do anything, even change the truth to prove an unconventional therapy has no value. Eventually, under the direction of the supervisors from Columbia (the site for the project), from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), the study degenerated into a morass of mismanagement, meaningless and manipulated data, the welfare of patients put at risk, and sadly, cover-up of the mismanagement right into the office of Dr. Elias Zerhouni, former NIH Director. The depths of deception go (almost) beyond belief!