Richard Proctor

Expert on the U.S. Constitution

Topic: The U.S. Supreme Court and Vaccine Mandates

Supreme Court decided that anything they say is constitutional.  Reversal of decisions on not taxing labor as income.

There’s something in the background that tells the Supreme Court justices what they must do.  Lincoln, Kennedy, Scalia – they didn’t do what they were supposed to.  Rumors about Roberts.

Watch the patterns of history.  The patterns don’t change.

US Constitution Article 6 Paragraph 3 requires federal and state elected officials and judges to follow the constitution. 

Fourth Amendment – the right of the people to be secure in their person.  Vaccine mandate not constitutional.

1803, 1806, 1819 Marshall SC decisions regarding power of judicial review were all in violation of the constitution. 

2021 Supreme Court said Texas had no standing in voter fraud case against another state.  But constitution does give the Supreme Court a role in controversies between 2 or more states.

Effort for REAL ID driver licenses failed, then magnetic strips on credit cards followed.

States can tell government agencies what they can or can’t do.  Governments can’t mandate masks or social distancing. 

It takes a mass of people to protest, and then the government edicts will go away.

It’s We the People, not us the government.  Constitution was written to be a chain on the federal government.  Federal govt can only do what is written in the Constitution.  States can do anything they want as long as the Constitution doesn’t prohibit it.

We have inalienable rights that can’t be taken by the government.  Ninth amendment says we have the right to exclude people.

Constitution applies to all people, not just the 39 signatories, because it was ratified.  Article 7.

How can a company mandate you get a vaccination?

A state not doing what the federal government wants still has statehood.  States can nullify anything not in the Constitution.

States can be taxed directly by the feds.  The state can say we’re not going to pay.   Not constitutional to say the people have to pay taxes directly to the federal government. 

'Richard Proctor – Going Rogue: The U.S. Supreme Court and Vaccine Mandates – December 15, 2021' have 6 comments

  1. December 16, 2021 @ 11:24 am walter

    So he is right and the Supreme Court is wrong because he said so? That is one book not worth reading.
    Your guest is bypassing some very important issues that would alter his theory. Saying that there is no bloodline in power still is ignorant when the legal definition for Prosterity is
    “Black’s law dictionary 1st edition
    POSTERITY.
    All the descendants of a person in a direct line to the remotest generation.”
    It’s very clear using the laws of English the word “capitonym” (look up the definition) applies here and limits who it applies to as bloodline. The founding fathers created a nation for THEIR benefit and Prosperity not yours. Just like the CROWN and the royal family. Just because the Queen dies does not remove the power structure of the CROWN. A new Queen/King takes the place ASAP.
    Justin Trudeau, 23rd Prime Minister of Canada is the 24th Great-grandson to King Henry III King of England.
    Hillary (Rodham) Clinton First Lady of President Bill Clinton is the 8th cousin 1 time removed to Justin Trudeau.
    Queen Elizabeth II Queen of the United Kingdom is the 2nd cousin 7 times removed to George Washington 1st U.S. President.
    Barack Obama 44th U.S. President is the 23rd Great-grandson to King Edward I King of England and 24th Great-grandson to King Henry III King of England
    Bill Gates Founder of Microsoft is the 28th Great-grandson to William the Conqueror King of England and the 34th Great-grandson to Alfred the Great King of the Anglo-Saxons.
    You can check bloodlines out at “FamousKin.com”.
    One must understand that “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” is not “UNITED STATES” is not “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”. Three different entities which your guest does not seem to understand.
    “THE OREGON TREATY, 1846 TREATY WITH GREAT BRITAIN,” acknowledges it.
    As well “The Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783” also makes reference to the separate entities of “United States of America” and “United States”. His theory is flawed because he does not acknowledge the difference.
    Also everyone mentions they want a “re-public”. Well China is a republic and there was a Republic of the Soviet Union. Which one do you want? You think calling it something different will magically change the outcome?
    Your guest claiming to be a “Constitution” expert needs to read the Law of Nations. The information he is pushing is dangerous.

    • December 21, 2021 @ 1:45 pm Sean

      Walter is correct. He needs to study and learn the law and study the Black Law Dictionary and the definitions.
      Words of ART is how they trick us every day.
      The ACTING judge in a courtroom he is a actor with no power if you do not give it to him.
      He needs to learn more on CONTRACT LAW. It’s the only law of the land that stands
      Two or more people need to sign and be a party to make a contract legal and lawful to make it binding on the party’s signature.

      • December 21, 2021 @ 3:36 pm patrick

        Hey Guys,
        I totally understand what you are saying and have studied this stuff with real patriots like yourselves a long time ago.

        You are talking about the truth. We are dealing in the Matrix. It’s all made up. I’ve known folks who are super smart and argued this stuff in court and they ended up in jail or
        thrown out. Proctor is working with the USC as written and tryin to get some things done within their corrupt system which as you know is a lie.

  2. December 23, 2021 @ 1:32 pm Gee

    walter: did you actually listen to this show?
    your words “Saying that there is no bloodline in power still is ignorant when the legal definition for…” suggest you did not.
    at which point did Proctor say this? I heard him say something very different.
    what he did say is that the signatories were bound because the states ratified it, and if there was no ratification, then even the signatories would not be bound to it, do you recall his example he used to illustrate his point? he was responding to a listeners question, btw. I thought his answer was as usual, very clear and simple.

    I for one would enjoy seeing this guest as a regular. This topic is a fundamental one, and I think he speaks with great clarity. Thanks Patrick!

  3. December 26, 2021 @ 7:08 pm walter

    “To be a good Patriot one must become the enemy of the rest of mankind”. Quote by VOLTAIRE

    I am looking at this as a neutral third party because I am not a US citizen or ever have been one. I am simply deconstructing language and superior International law.

    Yes Gee I have listened to it all and his interview with Patrick from before. And I have visited his website and read it as well. The question he responds to is a question of mine that I sent in and Patrick only read a portion of it to him. Perhaps if the rest of the question was read then maybe it would make more sense to you.
    The government was set up to work for “We the People” not “we the people”. This is a big difference here that is being over looked. Laws of language change the entire meaning to the compact. The public schools don’t teach this knowledge and the people assume they understand the meaning of the words when in fact they are ignorant to it. This is done by design. Just look what is happening today in the public fool system.
    At the 40:55 mark in the interview Richard fails to notice the difference between “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”, “UNITED STATES” and “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” when “The OREGON TREATY, 1846 TREATY WITH GREAT BRITAIN,” and “The Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783” are examples and proof that government acknowledges it. This is a major mistake made by him.
    At the 44:40 mark Richard states “read the words” when in fact he can’t read the words because of his lack of understanding of capitonym. If he did understand capitonym then he would understand his errors. As he states “that’s too bad”.
    Then at the 45:24 mark he fails again to understand “Prosperity” and “prosperity” which refers to bloodline’s and standing to the compact. Another misunderstanding of the law of the English language through capitonym. This law changes everything. Richard does not apply it. Big mistake.
    The Constitution of the United States 1787 was to inform King George of a compact made in the new world. It is an international document stating independence from the King. Creation of a new Nation.
    Ratification has a fairly long definition in Black Law 9th dictionary I do recommend one reads it.
    Since the Constitution in question is a private document created for an International purpose lets go to section 4. of the definition of “ratification”.
    4. Int’l law. The final establishment of consent by the parties to a treaty to be bound by it, usu. including the exchange or deposit of instruments of ratification . See INSTRUMENT OF RATIFICATION. Cf. CONFIRMATION. lCases; Treaties ratify, vb. ratifiable, adj.
    Please tell me how citizens have standing when they are not the parties to the treaty? So when he states because it was ratified the citizens become party to it makes zero sense in the law of contracts. The individual States have standing to use it but nowhere in the compact give this right to the citizenry.
    Citizens are property of the State. The State can bring the issue up for the citizen if the state wants to but the citizen cannot force the state to do so. The citizen has no standing to do so and the state has no obligation to do so. Once again it’s the law of contracts. Everything is a contract from the rights you are granted, the money you use and even the children we birth.

  4. December 26, 2021 @ 7:08 pm walter

    Richard has written several books but does that make him correct? It reminds me of the phrase ‘Those who can, do; those who can’t, teach.’
    If I’m wrong then please show me Richard’s Supreme Court case victories. Saying the judges are breaking the law when in fact they have the obligation to the government to do whatever it takes to preserve its existence for the Signatories and their Posterity by the Constitution granting them the unlimited power of preservation.
    If anyone does not like what the governments are doing then you have the non-derogable right to create your own compact for you and your Prosperity. In order to do that you must take the responsibility of self-governance just like the founding fathers did for themselves and their Prosperity. It was not done for you.
    “International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
    Article 1
    1. All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”
    On a side note of Prosperity (bloodline).
    The founding fathers created a nation for THEIR benefit and Prosperity not yours. Just like the CROWN and the royal family. Just because the Queen dies does not remove the power structure of the CROWN. A new Queen/King takes the place ASAP.
    Justin Trudeau, 23rd Prime Minister of Canada is the 24th Great-grandson to King Henry III King of England.
    Hillary (Rodham) Clinton First Lady of President Bill Clinton is the 8th cousin 1 time removed to Justin Trudeau.
    Queen Elizabeth II Queen of the United Kingdom is the 2nd cousin 7 times removed to George Washington 1st U.S. President.
    Barack Obama 44th U.S. President is the 23rd Great-grandson to King Edward I King of England and 24th Great-grandson to King Henry III King of England
    Bill Gates Founder of Microsoft is the 28th Great-grandson to William the Conqueror King of England and the 34th Great-grandson to Alfred the Great King of the Anglo-Saxons.
    You can check bloodlines out at “FamousKin.com”.

You may also like...

©Copyright One Radio Network 2019 • All rights reserved. | Site built by RedLotus Austin
The information on this website and talk shows is solely for informational and entertainment purposes. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE MEDICAL ADVICE. Neither the Editors, producers of One Radio Network, Patrick Timpone, their guests or web masters take responsibility for any possible consequences from any treatment, procedure, exercise, dietary modification, action or application of medication which results from reading or following the information contained on this website in written or audio form, live or podcasts. The publication of this information does not constitute the practice of medicine, and this information does not replace the advice of your physician or other health care provider. Before undertaking any course of treatment, the reader must seek the advice of their physician or other health care provider and take total responsibility for his or her actions at all times. Patrick Joseph of the family of Timpone, a man...All rights reserved, without recourse.