Stanislaw Burzynski, M.D., Ph.D.

Dr. Burzynski is followed by other members of his staff; patients; and Eric Merola, the director and producer of The Burzynski Film

Are Antineoplastons the Cure for Cancer?

StanislawTo summarize Dr. Burzynski’s story: He developed a cancer treatment that surpassed all other treatments on the market, and the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry knew it. They also knew he was the sole owner of the patents for this therapy, and these two facts combined, threatened the entire paradigm of the cancer industry.

So they decided to steal his invention. The problem is, they cannot actually use the stolen patents as long as Dr. Burzynski walks free and has the ability to defend his rights to them.

So, for the past 15 years, they’ve thrown everything but the kitchen sink at him in an effort to tuck him away in jail for the remainder of his life, or at the very least, make sure he doesn’t have a license with which to practice any kind of medicine. Without a profitable career, making and raising the needed cash for patent defense would be tricky. Sadly, you and I have all been paying for the brutal opposition to his cancer treatment this whole time. The US government spent $60 million on legal fees for just one of his trials alone…

Still, Dr. Burzynski has prevailed against enormous forces so many times it’s enough to make one believe in a higher power. Certainly, many of his patients would call him a God-send. Now, with the TMB finally dismissing their case against him, let’s hope that’s the end of the absurd witch hunt against Dr. Burzynski. (This summary of Dr. Burzynskis work is from Dr. Mercolas Website, please click here to read more)

Show Highlights:

-The smear campaign against Dr. Burzynski: There’s a 20 billion + market just for brain tumors alone; a cure for cancer would surely dig into the pockets of those profiting now. Dr. Burzynski is” determined to win in this country”. He passionately tells usof the media attacks, websites and others who are working fervently to discredit his work.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” Mahatma Gandhi

-Understanding antineoplastons; a cure for cancer?

-The battle with the FDA

-Cancer cells are our own cells; why do people with strong immune systems still get cancer?

-Cell phones; microwaves; pesticides; vaccines: environmental factors change the structure of genes

-What is the body doing when it creates a tumor?

-Totalitarian medicine: There is no freedom in medical science today; why are doctors no longer allowed to practice the medical arts?

-Eric Merola, the creator of ‘Burzynski’, the film, joins the conversation. Eric shares his insights into why the work of Dr. Burzynski is being attacked and antineoplastons withheld from those badly in need of this cancer therapy, which does no harm to the body and has passed the phase 2 clinical trials

-Lt. Ric Schiff calls in about 1.5 hours into the interview. He is the gentleman seen in the opening minutes of the film addressing congress about the success of Dr. Burzynskis cancer therapy. Lt. Schiff lost one of his twin daughters; not to cancer, but to her brain being ravaged by chemotherapy and radiation; she had been cured of cancer by Dr. Burzynski. Lt. Schiff has since created the ANP Coalition. It is their fundamental belief that the discovery of Antineoplastons (ANP) can and will herald a new age of medical science and subsequent advancements in the treatment of previously incurable diseases. This benign yet effective drug contradicts the paradigm that cancer treatments have to be harmful to be effective, and redirects modern medicine back to its salient principal Primum non nocere, “first, do no harm”.

-Mary Jo Siegel, a former cancerpatientwas cured of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in 1993 by Dr. Burzynski, calls in to share her story.She had an ‘incurable’ diagnosis before she began treatment;from one day to the next, a tumor in her neck disappeared. She was on antineoplastons for 11 months. She now leads the Burzynski Patient Group which raises public awareness of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski’s breakthrough treatment for cancer using antineoplastons and gene-targeted therapy. They also provide useful information and emotional support to cancer patients and their families. The website is a place where Dr Burzynski’s patients can share their personal stories with one another and the world.

–You may want to grab a tissue before the next story as we end the show with a heartbreaking, yet hope filled story of a mother who lost her 4 year old son to brain cancer. This is a shocking testament as to the rights and freedoms which have been taken from American parents and the tragedy of withholding a treatment which could havesaved a life. The mother, Donna Navarro, made a film,’Cut, Poison, Burn’about her journey through the treacherous medical system (Learn more here)Donna Navarro son was diagnosed with brain cancer

-Letting our congressmen know what we think; strength is in numbers, but do your research first; who’s funding their campaigns?

dr stanislaw burnski on curing cancer, january 28, 2014

'Are Antineoplastons the Cure for Cancer? : The Work of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski and the Smear Campaign to Discredit Him – January 28, 2014' have 4 comments

  1. January 29, 2014 @ 12:00 am Steve

    Thanks for your show today with Dr. Burzynski and related guests. It was so sad to hear how several of the parents unintentionally allowed the conventional doctors to kill their children by frying and turning to mush their brains with lethal doses of radiation. Too bad they did not know about the radiation protection offered by DIM and by DMSO:

    DIM protects cells from radiation

    Here is an excerpt from about half way down the page at http://www.thehealingjournal.com/dmso:

    “One who remembers the DMSO combination and Dr. Tucker very well is Alva Ruth Wilson in the Houston area. She qualified for his treatment because when she sought him out (after hearing the TV program), she had been given six months to live from lymphosarcoma. Starting in January 1973, she took an intravenous drip of the DMSO-hematoxylon mixture five days a week. Before requesting Dr. Tucker’s treatment, Mrs. Wilson had maximum amounts of chemotherapy and radiation, but neither helped – the tumors kept on spreading. Chemotherapy had to be stopped because its side effects were giving her leukopenia, a disease in which her white cells had dropped to way below normal, leaving her with almost no immunity. While she was on Dr. Tucker’s program, her conventional doctor wanted to give her more radiation. Dr. Tucker told her that since she was on DMSO, the radiation would not hurt her, a fact well established by clinical studies in various countries and virtually ignored in the United States. Although no primary source of her cancer was ever found, some cloudiness in X-rays of the stomach aroused suspicion, so that was where the radiation was directed. Another woman (not one of Dr. Tucker’s patients) who started radiation of the stomach the same day returned for the second treatment in a wheelchair, so ill had the radiation made her, and for the third on a stretcher as a patient in the hospital. But Mrs. Wilson, taking her daily DMSO I.V., took the same radiation and felt great. By January 1974, after a year on Dr. Tucker’s program, no more tumors could be found and she continues in fine health in 2000.

    Your comment that since sulfur transports oxygen into cells, sulfur would probably treat or cure cancer is quite insightful. Organic sulfur and related tree products such as DMSO seem to be rather simply magical in their ability to cure/heal/promote vitality. Since water molecules bind to DMSO 1/3 more tightly than to other water molecules (see paragraph below), the internal cellular water is flushed out as the DMSO is absorbed throughout the body. Curing cancer by flushing out the cells harkens back to what Dr. John Apsley talks about based on the work of Dr. Alexis Carrel and Dr. Gilbert Ling. Ya’ gotta love the tree juice!

    “Dr. Stanley Jacob has said from the beginning that DMSO is not a new drug but a new therapeutic principle. Dr. Morton Walker quotes chemist Dr. Harry Szmant as explaining the principle in this way, “Cellular damage can be repaired and cells healed and restored to near normal by changing the water structure within a cell” – and DMSO can do this. Cell wall permeability, increased by DMSO, also “alters what normally goes into and comes out of a cell, permitting the flushing of toxins out of the cells”. Dr Jacob points out that water bonds with DMSO one-third more tightly than with other water molecules; because it can flow through cell membranes, it can carry water into cells, replenishing and renewing them. DMSO can also carry other substances which normally would not move through cell membranes – i.e., it is a new therapeutic principle, a new way of cleansing and supplying nutrition to cells. DMSO also boosts the immune system, increasing the production of white cells and macrophages, and facilitating their movement as they search the body for materials that should not be there (such as microorganisms), destroying them.


    • January 30, 2014 @ 3:43 pm George Posnak

      My own experience with DMSO is limited to topical applications.
      I combined it with strong Lugols solution (7-10%) to “cure” several biopsied melanoma lesions. The DMSO will cause the Iodine to penetrate all the way to the bone.
      I have also applied DMSO with tea tree oil and have felt the heat in lymph nodes 8 inches away from a cancerous lesion on my back.
      Remarkable molecule.


  2. January 29, 2014 @ 2:39 pm Paul Morgan

    Oh dear! Here we have a classical example of how Stanislaw Burzynski and his acolytes protest against those who challenge them. They conveniently ignore basic facts about the abject failure of Burzynski to provide the evidence of benefit they all claim exists for his so-called “antineoplaston” therapy, despite his apparently having researched various peptides originally extracted from urine since at least 1976 (i.e. at least 37 years) in an attempt to find an effective treatment for cancer. By way of comparison the usual timescale for taking a new cancer drug from laboratory to full licensed production is about 10 years. Burzynski has published many articles about his “signature” therapy, but all they amount to are a handful of laboratory studies, a few case reports and case series cobbled together from various trials in a way that is scientifically nonsensical. Despite having registered over 60 clinical trials, Burzynski has only ever completed one trial, the results of which have never been published. Recently we discovered that much of the reason behind this failure to complete trials and publish results is down to a failure to maintain adequate records, destruction of baseline measurements, exaggeration of therapeutic responses and failures to report significant adverse events. We also found out that Burzynski had further failed to protect the interests of patients by abusing the approval process for admitting patients to “single patient protocol” or compassionate use exemptions for using “antineoplastons” outside the registered clinical trials. Basically, Burzynski has been playing fast and loose with people’s health and has ripped them and their families off for thousands if dollars. Money to pay for patients’ treatment has often had to be raised through charities and the generosity of strangers who unwittingly fund Burzynski’s lifestyle but don’t realise that they are being conned in the process. By and large, this is not the fault of the patients and families who, given the desperation of their situation, find themselves clutching at straws and will try anything. Sadly, this is a common modes operandi of quacks.
    Many of Burzynski’s acolytes point to the research of a Japanese anaesthesiologist, Dr. H. Tsuda. Quite why an anaesthesiologist should be researching cancer therapy is beyond strange. However, the great claim of his publishing proof of “antineoplaston” benefit is utter nonsense. The claimed proof is just a laboratory report of giving doses of these agents to cancer cells in Petri dishes far beyond anything that could be achieved when giving them to humans. The “antineoplastons” contain such vast quantities of sodium that any effect on cancer cells in a dish may be due to sodium toxicity rather than any actual effect of the “antineoplastons” themselves. This is such excruciatingly bad science that it’s embarrassing. That his acolytes think somehow that Tsuda’s work is of any value in purporting to be evidence of benefit only serves to expose their fundamental inability to understand science.
    It may well be that when Burzynski started his research back in the 1970s he did so with the best of intentions but, as has been seen in many, often high-profile, cases he became so convince that he was right that he lost sight of scientific rigour. However, whatever the reason or background, what has become apparent is that his treatments have never been shown in any meaningful way to have any benefit in the treatment of any cancer. Nor, as he has also tried it claim, is there any benefit for any of his treatments for HIV, vasculitis or as anti-ageing products. It seems pretty clear that, whatever his original intentions at the outset, Burzynski is purely in it for the money. He clearly has been a charmer and a smooth talker – he couldn’t have made his fortune otherwise. What is also clear, however, is that he has no scruples.
    I’m also not surprised to the see the comment above by “Steve” which attempts to promote other quack therapies such as DMSO. Sorry, Steve, but all you’re doing is displaying classical crank magnetism.


  3. January 30, 2014 @ 12:42 pm Lisa Beck

    I used to work at a biotech company in Kansas. We provided medium for cell culture for research and also the medium used when making biologic drugs. Because we were so closely connected with the process, I know a little bit about the pitfalls and timing.

    Why hasn’t Dr. Burzynski ever published any studies about his work that show actual progression, statistical analysis, etc.? If there is a $20 billion market to cure brain cancer, why doesn’t he work with the FDA to get his drug approved so he can be part of that market? He was given the opportunity to run multiple Phase II studies and had a Phase III study open for around a year, I think, without any enrollees. Since he was regularly treating patients with “Phase II” studies, I can’t quite understand why none of those patients were allowed to be Phase II instead?

    On DMSO – It was suggested I use it to help reduce inflammation and it did terrible, painful things to the skin in that area. Later, I was given one treatment with it for its only on-label approved use (as a 50%, sterile solution for interstitial cystitis, instilled intravesically) and it caused severe retention. It didn’t really seem like much of a miracle to me either off-label or as approved. There’s my anecdote for the day. :)


Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.

©Copyright One Radio Network 2019 • All rights reserved. | Site built by RedLotus Austin
The information on this website and talk shows is solely for informational and entertainment purposes. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE MEDICAL ADVICE. Neither the Editors, producers of One Radio Network, Patrick Timpone, their guests or web masters take responsibility for any possible consequences from any treatment, procedure, exercise, dietary modification, action or application of medication which results from reading or following the information contained on this website in written or audio form, live or podcasts. The publication of this information does not constitute the practice of medicine, and this information does not replace the advice of your physician or other health care provider. Before undertaking any course of treatment, the reader must seek the advice of their physician or other health care provider and take total responsibility for his or her actions at all times. Patrick Joseph of the family of Timpone, a man...All rights reserved, without recourse.