The world honey bee population has plunged in recent years, worrying
beekeepers and farmers who know how critical bee pollination is for many
crops. A number of theories have popped up as to why the North American
honey bee population has declined–electromagnetic radiation,
malnutrition, and climate change have all been pinpointed. Now a leaked
EPA document reveals that the agency allowed the widespread use of a
bee-toxic pesticide, despite warnings from EPA scientists.

The
document, which was leaked to a Colorado beekeeper, shows that the EPA
has ignored warnings about the use of clothianidin, a pesticide produced
by Bayer that mainly is used to pre-treat corn seeds. The pesticide
scooped up $262 million in sales in 2009 by farmers, who also use the
substance on canola, soy, sugar beets, sunflowers, and wheat, according
to Grist.

The leaked document (PDF)
was put out in response to Bayer’s request to approve use of the
pesticide on
cotton and mustard. The document invalidates a prior Bayer study that
justified the registration of clothianidin on the basis of its safety to
honeybees:

Clothianidin’s major risk concern is to
nontarget insects (that is, honey bees). Clothianidin is a neonicotinoid
insecticide that is both persistent and systemic. Acute toxicity
studies to honey bees show that clothianidin is highly toxic on both a
contact and an oral basis. Although EFED does not conduct RQ based risk
assessments on non-target insects, information from standard tests and
field studies, as well as incident reports involving other
neonicotinoids insecticides (e.g., imidacloprid) suggest the potential
for long-term toxic risk to honey bees and other beneficial insects.

The
entire 101-page memo is damning (and worth a read). But the opinion of
EPA scientists apparently isn’t enough for the agency, which is allowing
clothianidin to keep its registration.

Suspicions about
clothianidin aren’t new; the EPA’s Environmental Fate and Effects
Division (EFAD) first expressed concern when the pesticide was
introduced, in 2003, about the “possibility of toxic exposure to
nontarget pollinators [e.g.,
honeybees] through the translocation of clothianidin residues that
result from seed treatment.” Clothianidin was still allowed on the
market while Bayer worked on a botched toxicity study [PDF], in which test and control fields were planted as close as 968 feet apart.

Clothianidin
has already been banned by Germany, France, Italy, and Slovenia for its
toxic effects. So why won’t the EPA follow? The answer probably has
something to do with the American affinity for corn products. But
without honey bees, our entire food supply is in trouble.

 

Related:

Beekeeper Who Leaked EPA Documents: “I Don’t Think We Can Survive This Winter”

Timeline of a Bee Massacre: EPA Still Allowing Hive-Killing Pesticide

Ariel Schwartz can be reached on Twitter or by email.



'Wik-Bee Leaks: EPA Document Shows It Knowingly Allowed Pesticide That Kills Honey Bees' has no comments

Be the first to comment this post!

©Copyright One Radio Network 2019 • All rights reserved. | Site built by RedLotus Austin
The information on this website and talk shows is solely for informational and entertainment purposes. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE MEDICAL ADVICE. Neither the Editors, producers of One Radio Network, Patrick Timpone, their guests or web masters take responsibility for any possible consequences from any treatment, procedure, exercise, dietary modification, action or application of medication which results from reading or following the information contained on this website in written or audio form, live or podcasts. The publication of this information does not constitute the practice of medicine, and this information does not replace the advice of your physician or other health care provider. Before undertaking any course of treatment, the reader must seek the advice of their physician or other health care provider and take total responsibility for his or her actions at all times. Patrick Joseph of the family of Timpone, a man...All rights reserved, without recourse.